|
|
|
|
Home | Industry
Information | Business
News | Browse by
Publication | P | Physician
Executive |
|
Lawyers
say 'sorry' may sink you in court.
Article, News, Research, Information,
Industry & Business News » View
article excerpt |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Read ALL
the news from Goliath - Try Goliath Business News -
FREE! You can view this article
PLUS...
- Over 5 million business articles
- Hundreds of the most trusted
magazines, newswires, and journals (see list)
- Premium business information
that is timely and relevant
- Unlimited Access
| Now for a Limited Time, try Goliath Business
News - Free for 7 Days! |
 |
|
Tell Me More Terms and Conditions |
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
| |
 |
|
Publication:
Physician
Executive Publication Date:
01-MAR-06 Delivery:
Immediate Online Access Author: Butcher, Lola Full
Article:
Joanne Brindley just wants to
hear "I'm sorry."
A disabled woman with many medical
problems, the Boston-area resident prepared for a mastectomy
in 2004 by notifying her medical team that she required a
local anesthetic because of previous complications with full
anesthesia.
Her surgeon agreed and the plan was
documented in her medical chart. On the day of the surgery,
however, the only thing that kept her from being put to sleep
was Brindley's protest, which invoked a loud and ugly
confrontation with an anesthesiologist who was surprised,
confused and not on board with the plan.
"I'm strapped
down, partially nude, scrubbed--and she's holding a clipboard
over my face, saying 'you have to sign for general
anesthesia,'" Brindley recalls.
Eventually another
anesthesiologist administered a local anesthetic, the
procedure was performed--and Brindley became a poster child
for an organization that encourages physicians to apologize
for medical errors.
"I just want her to say, 'I'm
sorry' and understand how her words hurt so she doesn't do it
again," Brindley said on the Sorry Works! Coalition Web site.
"That's all I want. That's all most patients and families
want."
That may be true, but some health care lawyers
warn that "I'm sorry" should not trip lightly off a
physician's tongue. While they agree that physician apologies
may be appropriate in some circumstances, these lawyers are
reluctant to embrace the apology movement that is sweeping the
health care industry.
"From a straight legal sense,
are apologies a smart thing to do? It depends on what you're
apologizing for and what information is out there and what
liability you're incurring," says Michael Levinson, MD, JD, a
health care lawyer at Zuckerman Spaeder in Miami. "Common
sense would dictate yes, apologize--but we live in a world
full of liability and the ramifications of that can be very
far-reaching."
Sorry = confession?
Those two
little words--"I'm sorry"--can work wonders. Drain the coffee
pot before your spouse gets one last cup? "I'm sorry" is the
obvious first thing to say, almost guaranteed to build good
will that will smooth over the problem.
But what does
"I'm sorry" really mean? Is it:
* A confession that
you personally emptied the coffee pot?
* An expression
of regret that your spouse will not get the day's dose of
caffeine?
* An acknowledgement that an unattributed
screw-up has occurred?
"'Negligence,' 'wrong,'
'causation,' 'apologize,' and 'injury' are not simple
concepts," says Tony DiLeo, a New Orleans attorney who
practices health care law.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
For starters, there is the question of whether an
apology is an admission of responsibility.
Trial
lawyer David Florin, JD, a member of the health law section of
the American Bar Association, the Defense Research Institute
and the American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics, thinks
it is.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
"It's like
jumping out of your car after an accident and saying 'I'm
sorry. It's all my fault.' Try to defend that in court later,"
says Florin, a partner at Crowell & Moring, a Washington
D.C.-based law firm. "It creates an admission that will be
difficult to overcome. It's a confession of some sort."
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
But another lawyer with
equally impressive credentials in litigation sees it
differently. Dennis Drasco, JD, recently served as chairman of
the ABA's litigation section, representing 70,000 trial
lawyers across the country.
"If a doctor apologizes
and says 'I'm sorry,' I don't think that's an admission of
guilt," says Drasco, a partner in Lum, Danzis, Drasco &
Positan in Roseland, N.J.
Another kind of
lawyer--health industry risk management specialist Cynthia
Marcotte Stamer--sides with Florin.
[ILLUSTRATION
OMITTED]
"The reason lawyers, doctors and Indian
chiefs don't like somebody to say, 'I apologize, I'm sorry,'
is that it is an admission," says Stamer, a partner in Glast,
Phillips & Murray in Dallas. "And before you make an
admission, you have to know and be precise about what it is
you're admitting to, and what the consequences of that are."
In a growing number of states, so-called apology laws
keep a doctor's apology from being used in litigation, but
some fear that the very apology itself may provoke litigation.
Looking more closely at specific circumstances,
lawyers encourage physicians to think carefully before they
rush to apologize to their patients.
Remorse or
responsibility?
Bad outcomes are not all related to
medical errors, and physicians should be clear about whether
an error has occurred.
"A very large percentage of
medical malpractice claims that we see fall into those
categories where you have ... a drug reaction or an
unanticipated outcome that is nevertheless within the realm of
known complications," says Bruce Cranner, JD, a partner in
Frilot, Partridge, Kohnke & Clements in New Orleans.
For example, in certain surgeries, a nicked bowel or
artery may be a known complication of the procedure. A surgeon
must disclose to the patient what happened, but an apology is
not appropriate, he says.
"You can say 'we deeply
regret that this occurred' and 'we are concerned about your
health and well-being,' but there is no culpability there,"
says Cranner, a former officer in the medical liability and
health care law section of the Defense Research Institute.
One physician responding to the ACPE survey agrees.
"I feel that statements like 'I am sorry you are
having to go through these extra procedures or treatments" is
OK as long as it is clear the provider IS NOT apologizing,"
the physician wrote. "Usually there was not an outright error
so much as an untoward outcome resulting from excellent
intent."
When others are involved
A
physician's apology may have a different effect than is
intended or appropriate. In some circumstances, a physician
might seem to accept sole responsibility when fault is shared
with others.
"We should not use the term 'apology'
because most of the time the cause of an error is
multi-factorial and most often due to procedural/system
problems," one physician responding to the ACPE survey says.
"An apology is admission of individual guilt which may be
unwarranted and lead to erroneous conclusions in the legal
arena."
On the other hand, does a physician's apology,
by implication, extend to other members of the medical team or
the entire hospital?
"When a physician commits
malpractice in a hospital--or a nurse does--the hospital has
culpability potentially as well," Stamer says. "I've seen
situations where physicians who have been too honest from
another party's--sometimes the hospital's--perspective have
actually been disciplined in peer review."
If not "I'm
sorry," then what?
When a patient suffers an adverse
outcome, the physician's priority should be clear.
"The very first thing you have to do is try to clean
up the mess, whether you were the cause of it or not," Stamer,
the risk management specialist, says.
She calls it
"disaster support," making sure the patient feels that the
physician is on the job.
"'We're going to do
everything we can to stabilize the situation and help you get
through this.' That's not an apology," she says. "Saying that
in empathetic, humane terms is absolutely critical."
In her view, discussing possible causes of the bad
situation is fraught with peril.
"If you try to
explain, and then you try to qualify later, you're in trouble.
If you say, 'I had no fault,' and you did, you're equally in
trouble," she says. "So what you want to do is keep the focus
on the care until you can figure (everything) out. Don't whip
up the situation."
And if it is becomes clear that the
physician committed an error, then it is time for "I'm sorry."
"If you find out there's a problem, you can say, "I
apologize. We've looked into this and that, and it appears
that I did not fully appreciate the significance of the data,
or did not absorb it quickly enough," she says. "That's
probably going to be after an investigation."
Lola
Butcher writes about the business of health care for several
trade publications. She can be reached by e-mail in
Springfield, Mo., at lola@lolabutcher.com.
RELATED
ARTICLE: How to make a bad situation worse
Health care
lawyer David Florin no longer remembers what item--a sponge,
perhaps--was left in the patient's body after surgery. But he
has not forgotten the problems arising from the doctor's
apology in a medical malpractice situation several years ago.
"The doctor came out and said, 'We screwed up, the
nurses didn't count, and I'm sorry,' " says Florin, a partner
at the Washington D.C. firm of Crowell & Moring. "Boy, did
that come back to haunt."
Florin agrees that the case
was malpractice. But the rift caused by the specific words in
the doctor's disclosure made for what Florin calls a nightmare
trial.
"The nurses were angry at the physician and so
they tried to hang him out to dry, where it was clearly (a)
nurse ... who was counting," Florin says. "They started
testifying about how sloppy he was, what a horrible doctor he
was, and I don't think any of that was true."
By the
very fact that an adverse event occurred, investigations
ensued and participants were required to report what they
knew. What seems like a well-meaning apology to one person can
seem like passing the blame to another.
"Everybody in
the circle is responsible for watching out for everybody else,
reporting on everybody else, and protecting themselves," says
Cynthia Marcotte Stamer, a partner in Glast, Phillips &
Murray in Dallas. "When one chooses to speak, and speaks too
soon before everybody gets lined up ... everybody turns on him
because he's upset the apple cart."
And that can set
off a chain of events that will muddy the investigation as to
what actually happened, she says.
"People are back
filling on their nursing notes; they are trying to separate
themselves from the seriousness of their participation," she
says. "They're trying to point the finger anywhere but at
themselves."
Changing stories
When a patient
is struggling to understand an adverse outcome, an early
apology can turn out to be an unfortunate apology.
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
"You don't want to have
a situation where you say one thing and then a week later you
say something else and a week later you say something else,"
says Michael Levinson, MD, JD, a health care lawyer at
Zuckerman Spaeder in Miami. "The more times you change a story
for whatever reason, even if it is justified, there becomes a
question of whether one party is being honest with the other."
Florin hears that. Several years ago, the Washington,
D.C., lawyer represented a surgeon whose untimely apology--"We
must have done something wrong. I'm sorry"--reverberated all
the way to a jury verdict.
"If he had not said that,
the chances are (the patient) probably never would have sued,"
says Florin.
The surgeon made the apology after a
serious infection emerged near the patient's surgery site.
Eventually an infectious disease specialist determined that
the infection was not hospital-borne and, in fact, had been
present before the surgery.
"Because the doctor had
said 'I'm sorry and we screwed up,' it became very difficult
to defend that when our position later became the infection
had nothing to do with the treatment," Florin says.
During trial, the physician testified that he had
apologized to the patient, but he later learned that he was
not to blame. When the jurors were polled, they said they were
sympathetic to the surgeon's situation.
"The jurors
actually said, 'You know we hear you, but you bring in an
infectious disease expert and you pay him--what else is he
going to say?'" Florin recalls. "What (the jury) found the
most convincing was the doctor saying it was probably the
result of something he did. The jury heard that very human
remark and sort of didn't pay any attention to the experts."
--Lola Butcher
RELATED ARTICLE: Some
Physicians Discouraged from Making Apologies
Some
physician executives who participated in ACPE's Patient Trust
and Safety Survey expressed concern about the impact of
apologies. Here are some of their insights:
[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
* "There are
disconnects in my organization among the corporate level, the
local hospitals and the medical staffs on whether or not it is
appropriate to make an apology.... Most physicians are very
uncomfortable about making an apology because they have been
instructed by their malpractice carriers not to do this."
* "Our organization will apologize after a grievous
outcome but does not openly encourage medical staff to do so."
* "Although I believe that apologies should be made,
our lawyers and risk management personnel are very much
against it and block us from doing it."
* "Having a
good relationship with the patient and family is probably the
most helpful factor, but in this litigious society, where
everything that happens must be defined as somebody's 'fault,'
I am uncertain how much an apology will counteract the
'victim' mentality many people have."
* "Too many
physicians believe that offering an apology is the same as
admitting liability. An extensive educational campaign is
needed to correct this beginning in medical schools. This does
not need to wait for tort reform."
* "While I agree
apologies should be made, my apologizing to a patient was used
against me in a malpractice suit. I did win the suit, but I am
sure this influences the actions of many doctors."
*
"The word 'apology' seems inappropriate unless the provider
were to perceive negligence on his/her/its own part. To
acknowledge that there has been an adverse event directly
related to what was done or not done by the provider, genuine
concern for the patient's ongoing welfare, and an effort to
provide support and continuity of care is what is important.
'I'm sorry' is too easy, too dangerous, and meaningless unless
associated with the above three components."

More
articles from Physician Executive Save
these dates in 2008: escape to Florida for relaxation or feel
the energy on the streets of New York City. In either place
you'll get great education. Why not do both?(News)(Brief
article)(Calendar), 01-NOV-07 Certified
Physician Executive (CPE) Tutorial, 01-NOV-07 Winter
Institute., 01-NOV-07
Looking for additional
articles? Click here to search our database of over 3
million articles.
Looking for
more in-depth information on this industry? Click here to search our complete database
of Industry & Market reports by text, subject, publication
name or publication date.
About Goliath Whether you're
looking for sales prospects, competitive information, company
analysis or best practices in managing your organization,
Goliath can help you meet your business needs.
Our
extensive business information databases empower business
professionals with both the breadth and depth of credible,
authoritative information they need to support their business
goals. Whether it be strategic planning, sales prospecting,
company research or defining management best practices -
Goliath is your leading source for accurate
information. | |
 |
| |